Saturday, July 31, 2010

Interview with Kim Crutchfield ... Part Three

This is the concluding installment of a three-part interview with Dr. Kim Crutchfield, pastor of Taipei International Church.

In Part One, Kim answered questions about his pastorate in Taiwan, his doctoral studies, and his Pentecostal upbringing.  Part Two dealt with his years spent at Princeton Theological Seminary, under the tutelage of professors like Bruce Metzger and James Loder.

Crutchfield
Today the subject matter is much different.  Part of Kim's life journey took him through Atlanta, Georgia, where he served on the staff of Chapel Hill Harvester Church (aka, the Cathedral of Holy Spirit).  Much of what Kim experienced there was not joyful like his pastorate in Taipei, nor edifying like the classrooms of Princeton or Columbia Theological Seminary, where he earned both a master's and his doctorate.

Once a prominent charismatic megachurch, Chapel Hill Harvester Church (CHHC), under the leadership of the late Archbishop Earl Paulk, became a scandal-ridden spectacle.  As stories of sexual misconduct, as well as, stories of financial and psychological manipulation of the congregation oozed out of CHHC in the 1990s, it became clear that it was an unhealthy place.

That serious and sustained wrongs occured there is well-documented (see a Charisma magazine article here, a Lee Grady column here, and the video below from Fox5 in Atlanta).  Today's blog is not yet one more news report about the travesty at CHHC (that news, thankfully, is rather stale).  Instead, it is an attempt to learn from an insider's viewpoint on how parishoners might recognize the early warning signs of a church going spiritually, financially, and morally awry.

When I say "insider's viewpoint" I need to be clear:  Dr. Crutchfield was never, ever involved in the horrific events at CHHC, nor did he have knowledge of them when he was there as a staff member.  What he did see were the attitudes and teachings and actions that served as the seeds to produce such a terrible harvest.  He gained a great deal more information on the scandals by staying in contact with many former members of the church, ministering to them in such venues as the Cathedral Survivors internet forum.

Today, the massive cathedral that housed CHHC has been sold, and the very shrunken congregation, now led by Paulk's son, D. E. Paulk (his son by reason of an affair with his sister-in-law!) is pursuing a theology that is a mish-mash of charismatic Christianity, universalism, and Eastern mysticism.  As Lee Grady opines in another column,  "A pulpit that was already defiled by diabolical perversion is now the breeding ground for unthinkable deception."

JR:  What are some of the lessons to be learned from the Earl Paulk debacle?

KC:  Jon, I served in that ministry staff from 1975, after graduating from bible college, until the end of 1983.

Although many bad things happened and many people were hurt in that ministry, I learned much from it.  I kept in touch with many friends whose lives were affected by their participation in Chapel Hill Harvester Church and the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit long after I left CHHC and joined the United Methodist church.  I witnessed spiritual manipulation and crass social control in its raw form.  I learned to be critical of spiritual authorities in a healthy way.

When leaders resist questioning and set themselves above the flock there is danger.  As Lord Acton warned long ago, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely."  Red flags go up for me when a minister stresses the need for everyone to submit to his or her authority.  All leaders need healthy checks and balances.

One of the watchwords of the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit at its height was, "The kingdom of God is built on trust."  That sounded spiritual.  However, it translated to mean that members of the congregation should suspend all critical evaluations of spiritual leaders and trust them blindly.  This slogan led followers to believe that God would judge leaders for their mistakes and, therefore, their participation was not culpable.  Their only duty was to trust and obey spiritual authorities.  This is plainly false, but it formed the practical essence of Kingdom Now Theology.

The leadership used gifts of prophecy and discernment to gain control over people.  They placed one woman, touted to have the gift of discerning of spirits, in the leadership structure.  Whenever she sensed a staff member or someone in the congregation in disagreement with the direction of the Bishop, she would "discern" in them a "Judas Spirit" and "Spirit of Intellectualism", or that they were relying on the "mind of reason".  She would call them out in public to rebuke this spirit.  This was a ritual of humiliation.  It was a clever way to discredit anyone who opposed or questioned the wilder and wilder direction the leaders wished to take the congregation.

The Bishop prophesied that God had told him that everyone should offer twenty percent of their income to the church.  Who could question such a pronouncement?  If they did, were they opposing God's Man of the Hour?  Were they "Judas spirits" or relying on the mind of reason?  Such devices silenced voices of dissent.  This abuse of the gift of discerning of spirits was a form of crass social and spiritual manipulation.

I also learned that arrogance in leadership is ugly and destructive.  I am appalled at the number of those whose faith suffered damage through their participation in CHHC and the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit.  Many will never darken the doors of another church.  Their faith was so violated and their trust betrayed.  Yet the arrogance of the leadership prevented them from uttering words of apology for their wrongdoing.  Rather, they continued to vilify their victims and castigate the whistle blowers.  A clear acknowledgement of wrongdoing and an apology would have brought enormous healing to so many.  The leadership should own up to the scandals and come clean.  However, arrogance issued in denials and flat out lies.  They accused their victims of being instruments of Satan who wished to "destroy this ministry."  Abuses continued until they became undeniable and public.  It was a sorry spectacle and left enormous human carnage in its wake.

Nevertheless, some "true believers" still hang on to the decaying carcass.  I learned that religious committments that become fanatical have great tenacity.  Few people are willing to admit that they had played the fool.  The insular world of the religious sect keeps the devotees loyal to authoritarian leaders.  Binary thinking prevents people from healthy and critical assessment.

JR:  Thank you, Kim, for your candor and insights.  I pray the Lord's richest blessing on you and those you serve in Taipei.
.

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Interview with Kim Crutchfield ... Part Two

Bruce Metzger
This is the second installment of a 3-part interview with Dr. Kim Crutchfield, pastor of Taipei International Church.  (The first installment can be read here).

Raised in a Pentecostal home in the United States, but now a United Methodist minister in Taiwan, Kim has covered a lot of terrain --- literally and figuratively.

Today, we ask him about his seminary years at Princeton, particularly studying under Bruce Metzger (pictured on the right;  Dr. and Mrs. Crutchfield are pictured in the first installment).

JR:  Studying under the late biblical scholar and textual critic Bruce Metzger at Princeton Seminary had to be a delight.  Tell us about that experience.

KC:  I entered Princeton Theological Seminary's Master of Divinity program in the winter of 1984.  I had earned a Masters in Theological Studies in Ethics from Columbia Theological Seminary in 1982.  My transfer credits allowed me the elbowroom to choose many elective courses during my MDiv program at Princeton.  I selected the professors under whom I wished to study.

The last course Bruce Metzger taught before his retirement was the Book of Revelation.  He took the approach he later shared in his 1999 book Breaking the Code: Understanding the Book of Revelation.  I elected to take the Book of Revelation as a Bible course, primarily because I wished to sit at the feet of one of the foremost textual critics in the world.

Dr. Metzger delivered his lectures with great joy, brimming with calm insight.  Though not animated, he was never boring.  He was brilliant.  I soaked it all in.

The materials Dr. Metzger introduced to the class as background reading expanded my viewpoint on apocalyptic materials exponentially.  My Pentecostal bible college where I did my undergraduate studies trained me only in the Dispensationalist interpretation, an approach that sought to harmonize the prophecies of Daniel with the book of Revelation.  Hal Lindsey's Late Great Plant Earth was popular at the time of my undergraduate days.  Dr. Metzger's approach opened a new world of interpretation to me.

Dr. Metzger was a true gentleman, sheathing his vast knowledge in humility becoming to a great scholar.  He held the Bible in high esteem and brought a wealth of knowledge to the class.  I am grateful for the privilege to have studied under Dr. Bruce M. Metzger.

James Loder
Another professor that affected my life at Princeton Theological Seminary was Dr. James Loder.  He had written The Transforming Moment a few years before I entered Princeton.

Dr. Loder helped me claim my Pentecostal heritage during a time in which I was sorely tempted to abandon it.  The abuses to which I had witnessed and had been subjected almost led me to toss out the baby with the bathwater.  Dr. Loder's deep appreciation for Christian experience and the work of the Holy Spirit in the believer's life helped me to integrate the mind and the heart.

My Pentecostal colleagues had been distrustful of too many questions and suspicious of the intellect.  They counseled against too much head knowledge as dangerous to the faith.  Some of my Pentecostal friends disparaged seminaries (which they jokingly called "Cemeteries") as factories of unbelief and head knowledge.  I did not experience Princeton Theological Seminary that way.

Dr. Loder modeled intellectual acumen combined with a heart of love and devotion.  His lectures were electrifying.  He preached and taught through every class.  I hated when the lecture ended and class would dismiss.

NEXT SATURDAY:  Kim and Stephanie's years in Earl Paulk's Chapel Hill Harvester Church.  Read it here.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Interview with Kim Crutchfield ... Part One

When Kim Crutchfield received his doctorate from Columbia Theological Seminary in May, he was aware that he had traveled a long way from his earliest memory of religion --- sitting in an A. A. Allen tent revival. 

And some of the traveling has been literal:  Kim is currently the pastor of Taipei International Church in Taiwan.

To mark the occasion of Kim's recognition as a Doctor of Ministry, I thought it would be interesting to interview the United Methodist minister about his spiritual journey that has taken him through Pentecostalism, the Princeton classrooms of the late biblical scholar Bruce Metzger, the megachurch of the notorious bishop Earl Paulk, and now to the pulpit at Taipei International.

The interview will be posted in three parts:  today (Kim's background and thoughts on Pentecostalism), next Saturday, July 24 (his experiences at Princeton with Metzger), and finally, Saturday, July 31 (what he observed at Earl Paulk's church in Atlanta).

JR:  Kim, first tell us about your church in Taipei and how you came to pastor there.

KC:  My family and I were in the Philippines for several years, serving as United Methodist missionaries. I taught at Union Theological Seminary in Das Marinas, Cavite, and my wife, Stephanie, worked with an indigenous people group known as the Ayatas in the mountains of Tarlac (the Crutchfields are pictured below).  On weekends, I taught in the adult education department of Union Church Manila, an international church in Manila.

When our mission term of service was up, our mission board wanted to reassign us to Cambodia.  However, the pastor of the Union Church Manila told us about another international church pulpit that had recently become vacant, the Taipei International Church.  We prayed about it and then dropped in our application.  In a few short months, TIC decided that we were the couple for the position.  We moved to Taiwan in late November 2003.

Taipei International Church is an international congregation.  It is now in its 53rd year.

In 1957 a Methodist missionary began the Wesley Methodist Church in Taipei among the Mandarin-speaking Chinese who migrated to Taiwan with Chiang Kai-shek.  That congregation opened an English-speaking service that became Taipei International Church.

The people of TIC come from many countries and from all different denominations.  TIC is an exciting place to serve God.  The congregation is committed to mission on the island and in Asia, with outreaches to India, Indonesia, Cambodia, and the Philippines.  A large part of the TIC constituency is Filipinos who serve as Overseas Foreign Workers (OFWs).

We hold a special Tagalog Fellowship every Sunday, with several satellite congregations around Taipei.  Our youth have a worship service called Paradyme that meets every Sunday morning as an alternative worship service.

TIC supports many missions on Taiwan ranging from orphanages, crisis counseling services, ministries to rehabilitate alcohol and drug abusers, Gideon's International, and Christian camps for Thai workers.

TIC is a vibrant congregation serving the Tienmu section of Taipei.  We hold our main services in the Taipei American School.

JR:  What was the area of study you pursued in your doctoral program?

KC:  I entered the program at Columbia Theological Seminary called "Gospel and Culture".  This program aimed to equip the learners with tools to help us interpret the culture around us in which we do ministry.  The professors taught us the skills to serve as "theological ethnographers".  We interpret culture and gospel.  This is of particular interest to me.  Western culture is changing.  To speak a meaningful word of good news to the world in which we live,  we must understand the culture and how the gospel addresses it.

Since coming to Taiwan, I live for the first time in a culture that is not predominantly Christian.  Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism form the dominant religious committments in Taiwan.  Christianity comprises only about 2% of the population.  Through my program, I learned how to observe another culture and seek for better understanding.  What do the people value?  How do they think?  What symbols speak to them?

My studies led me to reflect on the phenomenon of ancestor homage, as they practice it in Taiwan.  My final project paper was on Concern over Ancestor Homage in Taiwan:  Toward a Culture Specific Catechesis for Taiwanese Christian Seekers.  I offered my reflections on how the church may respond to Taiwanese who seek to enter the church but struggle with family pressure to continue to worship their ancestors.  I hope to make a contribution to the ongoing dialog of Christians in Taiwan as they seek to evangelize and initiate new Christians into the faith.

JR:  As you evaluate your youthful years in Pentecostalism, what were some of the major pluses and minuses you saw?

KC:  Pentecostalism stresses that everyone is a minister.  Even as a child, I believed that God could use me to serve.  We believed that the Holy Spirit works through men and women, boys and girls.  Some scholars call this "the democratization of the prophetic spirit".  We were taught that the Holy Ghost (back then, we usually followed the KJV) would anoint "sons and daughters, menservants and maidservants, old men and young men" to speak the word of God.  God was near, not far away.  The Holy Spirit brought God close.  The Holy Spirit was God-in-Action among us, granting power for effective service.  Pentecostalism also led us to exercise spiritual gifts.  Prophecy and tongues were the main ones people talked about in our churches.  The plus was that we believed God could use us in the exercise of those gifts.  One did not need a seminary degree, or, even an office, to serve as an instrument of God's work in the world.

One minus was that our church stressed that the Holy Spirit would only come on persons who spoke in tongues.  They stressed the "baptism of the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues".  We looked at non-Pentecostal Christians as nominal Christians, lacking the Holy Ghost power.  That set up a natural one-upmanship, separating us from other brothers and sisters in Christ.

I also witnessed many cases of the abuse of prophecy.  Prophecy was often misused as a tool of crass social manipulation.  Some folks have trouble separating their own prejudices and biases from what God might say.  It is easy to add a "Thus sayeth the Lord" to cloak one's own agenda.  I have seen that happen before.

The Pentecostal movement stressed heart religion and experience.  That is a plus.  However, they were often suspicious of intellect.  Anti-intellectualism is a minus.  When I was a student in bible college, one teacher tried to dissuade me from pursuing my field of interest, ethics.  I believe she thought it too mentally challenging.  I have to laugh about it now --- I thought schools and colleges were centers of learning.  Yet, in that case, too much learning proved threatening.

NEXT SATURDAY:  Experiencing Princeton and the scholarship of Bruce Metzger.  Read it here.

Kim and Stephanie Crutchfield

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Kansas City 1977

Vinson Synan
Yesterday, Christianity Today magazine posted on its website an interview with Pentecostal historian Vinson Synan.  The occasion was the publication of Synan's new book, An Eyewitness Remembers the Century of the Holy Spirit (Chosen/Baker).

In response to a question about what was the high moment of the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement, Synan said, "The movement reached a climax in America around 1977 during the Kansas City conference, because all the different streams came together.  The 50,000 people in the stadium showed the vigor and force that was sweeping the world."

Synan, dean emeritus of Regent University's School of Divinity, goes on to note that national television and magazine outlets covered the conference, which was officially titled, the Conference on Charismatic Renewal in the Christian Churches.

An example of that coverage was this article published in the August 8, 1977 issue of TIME magazine.

"At one point, the Rev. Bob Mumford, a nondenominational evangelist from California, halted his speech at the Arrowhead Stadium, where the Kansas City Chiefs play football, and called time out for a 'Holy Ghost break.'  He began to shout: 'Glory to God!  Jesus is Lord.'  The audience rose and joined in," TIME reported.

The charismatic journal New Wine gave this account of the same moment, "That session was one of the highlights of the conference, especially in the middle of Bob's message, when, after he said, 'If you take a sneak look in the back of the book ... you find out that Jesus wins!'  the entire crowd spontaneously broke into a five or ten minute period of uninterrupted praise and worship."

I wasn't there, but I did hear a recording of that message, and the moment was super-charged with the Lord's presence.

New Wine's coverage of the momentous Kansas City conference --- including prophetic words that were given, and the text of Mumford's message, The Beauty of Holiness --- can be read here in the October 1977 issue of New Wine.  Readers without a high-speed internet connection should be aware that that link connects to a 64-page .pdf file --- the entire October 1977 issue.  (Mumford was also featured on this blog December 20, 2008, easily the most-viewed item ever on this blog.  Over 20 percent of the traffic on this blog goes to that item).

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Bethesda celebrates its 75th anniversary

M. D. and Harry Beall Sr.
Seventy-five years ago, in an old tire store on Nevada Avenue in Detroit, a mother of three started a Sunday School for her children and others in the neighborhood.

Tomorrow, more than 3,900 Sundays later, what has become the Bethesda Christian Church will celebrate all that God has done.

M. D. "Mom" Beall was the mother that started the Sunday School. She wasn't looking to pastor a megachurch, but that's what grew from her efforts. Over the decades, what was then known as, Bethesda Missionary Temple, grew and grew without any of the church growth methods advocated today. (A picture of Bethesda congregation, in LIFE magazine in June 1958, can be seen here --- you will need to scroll down the page).
.
According to her obituary in the Detroit News in September 1979:

"Membership in the tiny church, with Mrs. Beall as pastor, 'just exploded,' said her son, James. When the church grew out of its tiny quarters, Mrs. Beall's husband, a builder joined the project.

"'Dad was the builder; mother the pastor,' her son recalled."

Today, Bethesda is a suburban church in Sterling Heights, Michigan, seating 3,000. It is non-denominational, and can be characterized as Pentecostal or Charismatic (if by Pentecostal one means, practicing speaking in tongues, and if by Charismatic one means, operating in the gifts of the Holy Spirit).

After revival broke out in Saskatchewan in 1948, Mom Beall traveled to Western Canada to see what it was all about. Specifically, she went to meetings in Vancouver where the revival had spread, as well.

She returned ablaze with revival fire, and her church in Detroit became one of the centers of what became known as, the Latter Rain Movement. Other cities with prominent Latter Rain churches were Portland, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Memphis, Oklahoma City, Cleveland, New Orleans, Houston, and Vancouver, British Columbia.

Noted Pentecostal historian Vinson Synan says, "The Pentecostal movement was at a low ebb in 1948, with a growing dryness and lack of charismatic gifts.  Many who heard about the events in Canada believed that it was a new Azusa Street, with many healings, tongues and prophecies.  A large center of the revival outside of Canada was the Bethesda Missionary Temple in Detroit, Michigan pastored by Myrtle Beale [sic].  From Detroit, the movement spread across the United States like a prairie wildfire."  An Eyewitness Remembers the Century of the Holy Spirit (Chosen), p. 35.

Like far too many Pentecostal revivals, pernicious error crept into some of the churches. The most pronounced of these errors was a doctrine called, The Manifest Sons of God. Proponents of that doctrine taught that it did not matter what they did in their mortal bodies, because they had been spiritually glorified. Mom Beall and her children, who all followed her into the ministry, were grieved by such erroneous teaching and withstood it completely.

Two well-researched books chronicle the history of the Latter Rain Movement.   Richard Riss's The Latter Rain Movement of 1948 (Honeycomb Visual Productions) is currently the only book solely devoted to the topic.  Winds from the North: Canadian Contributions to the Pentecostal Movement (Brill Academic Publishers), edited by Michael Wilkinson and Peter Althouse, devotes two chapters (D. William Faupel's, The New Order of the Latter Rain: Restoration or Renewal?; and Mark Hutchinson's, The Latter Rain Movement and the Phenomenon of Global Return).

L. Thomas Holdcroft, a prolific Assemblies of God author, wrote an unflattering portrayal of the Latter Rain Movement in PNEUMA (Vol 2, No 2, Fall 1980), the journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies.  He gave his permission for the article to be published on the internet here.

Balanced Biblical teaching and spontaneous, anointed praise and worship have been hallmarks of church life at Bethesda. In fact, the late Judson Cornwall, known for his teaching on praise and worship, stood in Bethesda's pulpit once and told the congregation he was not sure why he had been asked to teach there because the first time he had ever heard the kind of praise and worship that he talked about, he was listening to a tape recording of Bethesda. The beauty and harmony of Bethesda's spontaneous worship has been compared to a "heavenly choir" by many that have visited the church.

As noted, Mom Beall passed away in 1979. Her eldest, Patricia Gruits, is in her 80s now, but remains active in teaching and missions ministries. Her book, Understanding God, is a best-seller read worldwide.

The son quoted in the obituary, James Beall, went on to become one of the most sought after speakers in the charismatic movement of the 1970s. From articles in the Logos Journal to speaking at major events like the World Conference on the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem to teachings delivered to Roman Catholic charismatic audiences, James was in the thick of things. He wrote several books, including Laying the Foundation, a methodical teaching on the Christian life using Hebrews 6 as its springboard. He assumed both the pastorate of Bethesda and the microphone of the national radio broadcast, America to Your Knees, from his mother. After decades in Bethesda's pulpit he retired from daily ministry in 2004. He is seen in the photograph above, commissioning his daughter, Analee Dunn, to the senior pastorate.
.
The youngest of the three, Harry Beall Jr., was for years Bethesda's minister of music, in addition to ministering the Word there and in congregations throughout the United States. Now retired from Bethesda's ministry, he lives in Mesa, Arizona.
.
I salute and thank Bethesda, its congregation and ministers, for 75 years of faithful service. Enjoy your celebration tomorrow!

A video commemorating the 75th anniversary can be seen here.
.
Bethesda's website can be accessed here. There is a Facebook group that shares memories of youth activities at Bethesda Missionary Temple. It is administrated by Tony Weatherly and can be linked to here.
                                  *   *   *   *
Latter Rain links on the internet: